Science and Technology Policy: A View from Washing.Neutrino speed as a function of relativistic kinetic energy, with neutrino mass Chemical Vapour Deposition Synthetic Diamond: Mate. Thus v Not All Interactive Engagement is the Same: Variat.'Raymond Davis Jr., Nobelist Who Caught Neutrinos, Dies at 91', The New York Times, 2 June 2006. The Donegall Lecture: Development of physics from a mathematical point of view by Ludwig Faddeev (Stetlov MI, Russia), 7.30 pm, Thursay, 6 May, Walton LT, Arts Block, TCD. Astrophysical Journal 496.- final results of Homestake Experiment References. The 7th JL Synge public lecture: Making light of mathematics by Michael Berry: 8pm, Tuesday, 27th April, 2004 in TCD, venue TBA.

High-Energy Particle Physics Demystified 'Measurement of the solar electron neutrino flux with the Homestake chlorine detector'.

Approaches to Understanding Cosmic Acceleration.

Steven Weinberg: Master Builder of the Standard Model.

FY 2010 US Defense Science and Technology Appropri.

Science and Technology Policy in the Obama Era.

Is George Smoot Smarter Than A 5th-Grader? Here is what I promised for MINOS: ( in general the energy-time uncertainty relation in particle detectors, in terms of speed-time uncertainties for any particle).

Shukla (Submitted on ) Abstract: Probably not.

UK's Science Figures Are 'Science Fiction' Check out the abstract:- High Energy Physics - Phenomenology Can apparent superluminal neutrino speeds be explained as a quantum weak measurement M.

How Much of the Human Body is Made Up of Stardust?.

The severity of the supernova bound and of the kinematical constraints of CohenGlashow type lead us to focus on scenarios where all types of particles are superluminal inside matter. Quantum Entanglement Visible to the Naked Eye? Abstract We revisit the model building challenges that one faces when trying to reconcile the OPERA claim of neutrino superluminality with other observational constraints.* Juan Ignacio Cirac of the Max Planck Institute for Quantum Optics in Garching, Germany and Peter Zoller of the University of Innsbruck in Austria, whose work on quantum switches has made possible quantum computers. * John Pendry of Imperial College of Science and Technology in London, Sheldon Schultz of the University of California San Diego and David Smith of Duke University, whose prediction and discovery of negative refraction makes possible meta-materials, used to make 'invisibility cloaks' to deflect various wavelengths of electromagnetic radiation. It seems odd to me that they have not been recognized by the Nobel committee.' 'They are all in every physics text book now. 'It describes certain aspects of electromagnetics that violate classical descriptions of physics,' Pendlebury said. * Yakir Aharonov of Chapman University in Orange, California, Tel Aviv University, and the University of South Carolina, and Michael Berry of the University of Bristol in Britain for their discovery of the Aharonov-Bohm Effect and the related Berry Phase. This year, for physics, the prediction falls onto: Check all the winners of Wolf Prize in Physics presented under Wolf Prize. Still, it's a fun game to play, and along the way, we recognize and mention those who are utterly deserving of the award. The prize in physics has gained a reputation for identifying future winners of the Nobel Prize Р“Сћ from the 26 prizes awarded between 19, fourteen winners have gone on to win the Nobel Prize, five of those in the following year.

Last year, they got the one for physics completely wrong! :) Sir Michael Berry, University of Bristol, United Kingdom View Details. It is that time of the year again when Thomson Reuters plays this game of predicting this year's Nobel Prize winners.

Michael berry superluminal neutrino